Valued For Character Not Gender Sociology Essay

“ It was we, the people ; non we, the white male citizens ; nor yet we, the male citizens ; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union… Men, their rights and nil more ; adult females, their rights and nil less. ” This quotation mark from celebrated women’s rightist, Susan B. Anthony, to me embodies the ideal of a universe where work forces and adult females are valued for the content of their character and non so much for their gender. In the past, we have existed in a universe where one sex was seen or treated as being superior to another. We existed in a male dominated society or a patriarchal society. However, after the debut of the adult females ‘s motion and the debut of subsequent women’s rightist groups, adult females have been able to obtain equality in many if non all the countries they sought equality on. It should hold been safe to declare that today we live in a society where there is gender equality. Unfortunately, this is non true for work forces and male childs, in many parts of North America. Whereas adult females have made immense additions in advancing their concerns, work forces and male childs issues have been on a steady diminution.

Today immature male childs and work forces are in crisis, as work forces make up the huge bulk of inmates in prison, they are outnumbered at college campuses, they are outlived by adult females, , they are more likely to endure from mental diseases, they are more likely to perpetrate self-destruction, they are less likely to derive detention of their childs after a divorce, work forces work at the most unsafe occupations, work forces are more likely to be involved in accidents, work forces are non adequately represented in many profession such as instruction, nursing and kids ‘s societal services, they are the bulk being killed on conflict Fieldss and face a host of other issues. If work forces are so taking in today ‘s society, they are paying a phenomenal cost for that privilege. If there of all time was a demand for a amalgamate motion to deliver work forces, now is the clip more than of all time. As stated in the gap sentence, gender equality should be about both work forces and adult females, both groups need attending to be placed on their issues of concern to guarantee that neither group is disadvantaged to the benefit of the other. The issues that work forces face are sedate plenty to justify the creative activity and nutriment of groups geared at advancing the cause of work forces. This paper seeks to cast some visible radiation on the different work forces motions and their effectivity in covering with work forces issues.

Harmonizing to Jesser ( 1996 ) “ Social motion gaining control agitation and constitute recurrent phenomena in modern societies since they represent a significant figure of people who feel disenfranchised, alienated, disrespected, oppressed, or in other ways overlooked, discontented, or unrealized. ” ( p. 3 ) . The fact that there are work forces out there who feel sufficiently threatened and underrepresented is testament in my position that there is demand for a motion to cover with male issues. Whether these concerns are valid or non in position of the issues faced by adult females, the really fact that work forces believe they exist, is adequate to hold them dealt with. Besides, if one were to follow some of the theories presented by the feminist motion, in that, work forces in the current patriarchal constitution is responsible for many of the jobs faced by adult females, so, would it non be wise to prosecute work forces in a meaningful manner. Through a motion that would let work forces to re-identify themselves and make up one’s mind how they fit in a new constitution of gender equality. Jesser ( 1996 ) further asserts that, “ A societal motion concerns the issues of specifying cardinal ends, enrolling disciples, and puting up organisational machinery for sustained action since the achievement of many ends requires long-run attempt. ( p 4 ) . To deny work forces the chance to come together to contend for issues that concern them in my position is prejudiced and incorrect. Are we stating so that it is all right for adult females as a group to come together to cover with feminine issues but that the adult male, because he is perceived to be in a place of power that he is prohibited from coming together to cover with the issues that straight affect him?

Again I have to turn to Clinton J. Jesser in his book Fierce and stamp work forces: sociological facets of the work forces ‘s motion, where he says “ As long as societies label people ‘male/female, ‘ ‘boy/man, ‘ ‘girl/woman ‘ and attach some significance to these labels, genderology has a capable matter-a ground for being. Another definition of genderology would be the scientific survey of the regulations, functions, relationships, personalities, and individualities, environing being male or female in a society. ” ( p. 5 ) . So the fact that we bracket work forces in a peculiar class is ground for motions and/or surveies that seek to cover with issues faced by that group.

Although I agree with the demand for a motion or motions to stand for the issues faced by work forces in society, I do non needfully hold with the position of all of the bing work forces ‘s groups out at that place. I would wish to now turn my attending to the groups available stand foring the voice of work forces.

Kimmel ( 1995 ) divides today ‘s work forces ‘s motion into three reasonably distinguishable cantonments: antifeminists, profeminists, and masculinists. Antifeminists believe that the adult females ‘s motion has caused the prostration of the natural order, one that guaranteed male laterality, and they work to change by reversal this tendency. The national Organization for Men ( NOM ) opposes feminism, which it claims is “ designed to minimize work forces, exempt adult females from the bill of exchange and to promote the decomposition of the household ” ( Siller 1984, quoted in Kimmel 1995, p. 564 ) . Some antifeminists ‘ responses emphasize “ work forces ‘s rights, ” particularly male parents ‘ rights, and non experiencing guilty in relationships with adult females. ( Lamanna and Reidmann 2007, p. 104 )

Profeminists support women’s rightists in their resistance to patriarchy. They analyze work forces ‘s jobs as stemming from a patriarchal system that privileges white heterosexual work forces while coercing all males into restrictive gender functions. In 1983, profeminists work forces formed the National Organization for Men ( changed in 1990 to the National Organization for Men Against Sexism, or NOMAS ) , whose intents are to exceed gender stereotypes for regard and equality ( Doyle 1989 ) . ( Lamanna and Reidmann 2007, p. 105 )

The newer masculinists, who emerged in the early 1990s, tend non to concentrate on patriarchate as debatable ( although they might hold that it is ) . Alternatively, masculinists work to develop a positive image of maleness, one combine strength with tenderness. Their way to this is through therapy, consciousness-raising groups, and rites. The latter encourage work forces to let go of the “ wild adult male ” from within the socialised or “ civilized ” adult male. ( Lamanna and Reidmann 2007, p. 105 )

Within these chief motions are many smaller groups with their ain alone individualities. The dominant motion among the work forces ‘s motion seems to be the profeminists motion. I excessively would tilt towards the profeminists motion, because it promotes gender equality. However, I believe a mix of the profeminists and masculinists might be a better topographic point to be at. I believe in gender equality and back up the right of adult females to make as they please and to be identified harmonizing to the criterions they put in topographic point. There is besides the strong belief that adult male as a gendered group should hold the right to specify their ain individuality, supplying that such individuality does non conflict upon the rights of others. Within both of these motions are cardinal unfavorable judgments that may really good keep true. Many see these motions as stand foring the voice of the white male society, and exclude the voice of other minorities.

Although, I believe that there are many countries where work forces need aid, I besides believe that some of the issues supported by some of these groups are contrary to what I believe. It is true that as the legal, political and other systems seek to include adult females as equal they have steamrolled some of the rights of work forces, and excluded work forces where they should hold clearly been included. For illustration women’s rightist groups justly stand against force perpetuated against adult females by work forces. Yet many of the women’s rightist groups and authorities plans fail to set plans in topographic point that mark immature male childs and work forces, with the hope of altering the cardinal instructions that is the root cause of these Acts of the Apostless of force. If work forces are the job, so prosecute them in position of happening solutions.

For work forces at that place seem to be a great trade of confusion where individuality is concerned, society tells the adult male that ‘real work forces do n’t shout ‘ and so subsequently accuse them of being insensitive when they are non at that place emotionally for their households. Through drama and other societal conditioning male childs are taught to be violent, yet society once more punishes work forces when they subsequently follow their early conditioning. There is demand for surveies and plans that will assist work forces cover with issues such as individuality, their functions in a changing society, covering with equality among the sexes and other pertinent issues. I strongly believe that if the ‘man ‘ is a great portion of the job, as women’s rightists asserts, so, they should be a great portion of the solution. We besides need to acknowledge that work forces as a group have their ain issues, which must be dealt with. Issues such as high degrees of criminalism and self-destruction among work forces, low representation in occupations such as instruction, nursing, and societal services, besides the figure of work forces traveling on to college has declined steadily over the old ages. Add to these concerns, issues of individuality, and one can clearly see the demand to be given to the demands of adult male. If these issues are non dealt with in a responsible mode, work forces will go on to be a load on society and their households. These issues are non merely of import to work forces but to adult females and society as a whole.